Court to hear arguments on Trump travel ban

Following the executive order banning seven core Muslim nation from entering the United States under the vetting extreme process, a US federal judge appointed under the Bush administration had placed a hold on the travel ban placed on seven Muslim nation. According to the federal Judge, Trump's target on a particular religion on the guise of an extreme immigration vetting shows the disorderliness of the constitutionality of what MR. president stood for and as such does not align with the America dream whose core tenets has been a total embrace of all who comes with a positive note.

The executive order which sees both the travel ban and stay uncertainty of all those who currently holds a valid US visas from these targeted Muslim nation will no doubt cause a break in the ties cardinality and absolute diplomatic friendliness among some of these nation, most especially the Iranian government who now frown at such political tantrums currently been displayed by Donald Trump.

Trump who had been in the news for all the wrong reasons ever since resuming as the 45th president of the United States comes again in a face-off with Justice James Robart who now stands in his way of portraying what his inaugural statement of an "American first" must look. According to Donald Trump, the decision by the US district court judge to counter his executive order is nothing but a quick attempt to undermine not just his presidency but also to put to security structure of the United States at risk. In a tweet on Monday night, Trump said: 

"The threat from radical Islamic terrorism is very real, just look at what is happening in Europe and the Middle-East. Courts must act fast!" 

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco will hear arguments over whether to restore the ban from Justice Department lawyers and opposing attorneys for the states of Minnesota and Washington at 3 p.m. PST. 

According to opponents of this ban policy, the 90-day ban barring entry for citizens from Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen and imposing a 120-day halt to all refugees, is illegal. The state of Washington argues it has suffered harm, saying some students and faculty at state universities had been stranded overseas because of the ban.

U.S. Justice Department will face off with opponents in a federal appeals court Tuesday over the fate of President Donald Trump's temporary Muslim ban targeted on core nation. 

     

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Trump and FBI director Comey

Manchester still in pains

James Comey and the future